Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
S J, Suji Prasad
- Understanding Knowledge Domain in Outcome Based Education through Cooperative Learning Method
Abstract Views :307 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Kongu Engineering College Perundurai, Erode, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Kongu Engineering College Perundurai, Erode, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No 4 (2023), Pagination: 7-12Abstract
The Outcome Based Education (OBE) plays a major role in improving the quality of an education system. In OBE knowledge, skills and attitudes of a graduate are the major components. In this paper effective teaching of cognitive domain in the outcome based education is analyzed. The jig saw based cooperative learning method is the one which involves group participation model that encourage peer teaching and learning in an effective way. On practicing the cooperative learning method 91.67% of expected attainment is achieved. This method proves to be the effective one for understanding cognitive domain in the outcome based education.Keywords
Attainment, Blooms' Taxonomy, Cooperative Learning, Jig Saw Method, Outcome Based Education.
References
- Ernst and Young LLP, 'Perspective 2030: Recounting two decades of transformation in higher education' Higher Education in India: Vision 2030, FICCI Higher Education Summit 2013.
- www.nbaind.org. Accreditation Manual for UG Engineering Programmes (Tier-I), June 2015.
- Dee Fink L (2003), 'Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses', Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco.
- Dee Fink L (2009), 'Designing Courses for Significant Learning: Voices of Experience', Jossey-Bass Series on New Directions for Teaching and Learning, A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco.
- Richard Felder and Rebecca Brent (2009), 'Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria', Journal of Engineering Education, vol: 92, no: 1, pp 7-25.
- Glatthorn, A. A. (1993), 'Perspectives and imperatives: outcome- based education: reform and the curriculum process', Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, vol: 8, no: 4, pp. 354-363.
- Rashid, M. H. (2013), 'The Process of Outcome-Based Education - Implementation, Assessment and Evaluations' 2013 ASEE International Forum, Atlanta, Georgia.
- LiliyaAkhmadeeva, Maureen Hind and Carolyn J. Sparrey(2013), 'Overcoming Obstacles to Implementing an Outcome- Based Education model: Traditional versus Transformational OBE', Proceedings of 2013 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA13) Conference, pp 1-5.
- Bloom, B. S. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956), 'Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals by a committee of college and university examiners', Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. Addison-Wesley , New York.
- Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001), 'A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives: Complete edition'. New York: Longman.
- Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R.C., and Gibson, H.W. (1998), 'Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Better Instruction', Houghton Mifflin Co, New York.
- Teo, R. and Wong, A. (2000), 'Does Problem Based Learning Create A Better Student: A Reflection', 2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Problem –Based Learning: Education Across Disciplines, December 4-7, Singapore.
- Boud, D. and Feletti, G. (1999), 'The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning', (2nd Ed.), London: Kogan Page.
- Charania NA, Kausar F and Cassum S. (2001), 'Playing jigsaw: a cooperative learning experience', Journal of Nursing Education, vol: 40, pp 420–421.
- Millis, B. J, Cottell, P. G., Jr. (1998), 'Cooperative learning for higher education faculty, American Council on Education', Series on Higher Education, The Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ.
- Perkins, David V., Saris and Renee N. (2001), 'A “jigsaw classroom” technique for undergraduate statistics courses', Teaching of Psychology, vol: 28, pp 111–113.
- Elora C. Voyles, Sarah F. Bailey and Amanda M. Durik (2015), 'New Pieces of the Jigsaw Classroom: Increasing Accountability to Reduce. Social Loafing in Student Group Projects', The New School Psychology Bulletin, vol: 13, pp 11–20.
- Souvignier E and Kronenberger J. (2007), ' Cooperative learning in third graders' jigsaw groups for mathematics and science with and without questioning training', British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol: 77, pp 755–771.
- Tanner K, Chatman LS and Allen D (2003), 'Approaches to Cell Biology Teaching: Coope r a tive Le a rning in the Sc i enc e Classroom—Beyond Students Working in Groups', Cell Biology Education, vol: 2, pp 1–5.
- Bharti Bhandari, Bharati Mehta, ManishaMavai, Yogendra Raj Singh and Anish Singhal (2017), 'Jigsaw Method: An Innovative Way of Cooperative Learning in Physiology', Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol: 61, no: 3, pp 1-7.
- Assessment of Program Outcomes in Outcome Based Education through Students' Co-Curricular Activities
Abstract Views :81 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Kongu Engineering College, Erode, TamilNadu, IN
1 Kongu Engineering College, Erode, TamilNadu, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No 4 (2023), Pagination: 58-64Abstract
In recent years Outcome Based Education (OBE) has become the focal point in the Indian Higher education system. The National accrediting agency, such as NBA and NAAC expresses the significance of assessing the program outcomes. This paper discusses assessing program outcomes through students' co-curricular activities such as paper and project presentations and internships/industrial projects. The proposed method gives an in-view of the rubrics-based measurement of program outcomes PO1-PO12, PSO1&2 mapped with students' co-curricular activities. The outcome-based assessment of program outcomes will be beneficial in advancing higher education in India.Keywords
Co-Curricular Activities, Internship, Outcome Based Education, Paper and Project Presentation, Program Outcomes, Rubrics.References
- Accreditation Manual For UG Engineering Programs (TIER-I) (2019). https://www.nbaind.org/files/UG%20-%20Tier%20I%20Manual.pdf.
- B. Pejcinovic, “Design of Rubrics for Student Outcomes in 2019-2020 ABET Criteria,” 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), pp. 1543–1548, 2020.
- K. Y. Tshai, J.-H. Ho, E. H. Yap, and H. K. Ng, “Outcome-based Education – The Assessment of Programme Educational Objectives for an Engineering Undergraduate Degree, ” Engineering Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–85, 2014.
- M. R. Jadhav, A. B. Kakade, S. R. Jagtap, and M. S. Patil, “Impact assessment of outcome based approach in engineering education in India,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 172, pp. 791–796, 2020.
- J. Mohanta and S. K. Das Mandal, "The Eff e c tivene ss of the Out come -Ba s ed Curriculum Towards Improving Educational Quality for Technical Education," 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 2019, pp. 242-243, doi: 10.1109/T4E.2019.00-13.
- R. Nordin, A. A. Bakar, N. Zainal, and H. Husain, “Preliminary Study on the Impact of Industrial Talks and Visits towards the Outcome Based Education of Engineering Students,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 60, pp. 271–276, 2012.
- T. Sasipraba, R. K. Bantha Navas, N. M. Nandhitha, S. Prakash, J. Jayaprabakar, S. P. Pushpakala, G. Subbiah, P. Kavipriya, T. Ravi, and G. Arunkumar, “Assessment Tools and Rubrics for Evaluating the Capstone Projects in Outcome Based Education,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 172, pp. 296–301, 2020.
- R. A. Rahmat, “Achievement of Program Outcomes Using Assessment Plan,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 87–93, 2011.
- P. Jayarekha and M. Dakshayini, "Programme outcomes assessment by direct method," 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), 2014, pp. 264-267, doi : 10.1109/MITE.2014.7020285.
- H. F. Wahab, A. Ayob, W. M. Zaki, H. Hussain, A. Hussain, and S. S. Mokri, “Program Outcomes Measurement and Assessment Processes,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 49–55, 2011.
- J. M. Zeeman, A. A. Bush, W. C. Cox, and J. E. McLaughlin, “Assessing the Co-Curriculum by Mapping Student Organization Involvement to Curricular Outcomes Using Mixed Methods,” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 83, no. 10, p. 7354, 2019.
- Liew, C. P., Puteh, M., Mohammad, S., Omar, A. A., & Kiew, P. L. (2020). Review of engineering programme outcome assessment models. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1852533
- Liew, Chia Pao, Marlia Puteh, Shahrin Mohammad, Abdul Aziz Omar, and Peck Loo Kiew. "Review of engineering programme outcome assessment models." European Journal of Engineering Education 46, no. 5, 834-848, 2021.
- Matthews, Megan E., Ani Avoundjian, Dalia Ameripour, Whitney Fakolade, Maryann Wu, and Ian S. Haworth. "Assessment of the impact of co-curricular activities on achievement of Doctor of Pharmacy program outcomes." Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 14, no. 4, 440-448, 2022.
- Amirtharaj, S., G. Chandrasekaran, K. Thirumoorthy, and K. Muneeswaran. "A Systematic Approach for Assessment of Attainment in Outcome-based Education." Higher Education for the Future 9, no. 1,pp. 8-29,2022
- “Examination Reform Policy-aicte-india.org.” https://www.aicte-india.org/sites/default/files/ExaminationReforms.pdf. 2018.